See what a research-backed GTM deliverable actually looks like
A 9-page extract from a completed 10-phase Sagentix engagement. Every figure is reproduced verbatim from the firm's own internal reference engagement, so every claim is verifiable on request.
This is an extract, not a full deliverable. What you're downloading is a curated 9-page tour of the format and rigor of a completed Sagentix engagement.
A complete 10-phase Sagentix GTM produces approximately 600–900 pages of written deliverables across the ten phases, plus executive PowerPoint, phase briefs, and a complete evidence archive. Each individual phase is a 60–130 page stand-alone research document.
What you'll see in the sample
Four phases most relevant to a board-grade evaluation
Phase 01 — Market Intelligence
~88 pagesTAM / SAM / SOM with 3-filter methodology, per-vertical Porter's Five Forces, 10+ competitor profiles, 7 strategic imperatives.
50+ APA in-text citations
Phase 06 — Pricing Strategy
~60 pages4-tier pricing model with TCO comparison, value-based pricing framework, and per-vertical pricing playbooks.
30+ APA in-text citations
Phase 07 — Business Model
~70 pagesBusiness Model Canvas with unit-economics dashboard, 3-scenario financial model, competitive moat assessment.
25+ APA in-text citations
Phase 08 — Strategy Execution
~95 pages90-day sprint plan across three 30-day phases, KPI dashboard, milestone definitions, 12-month strategic roadmap.
40+ APA in-text citations
Why this matters for a B2B tech founder evaluating GTM advisors
The Trust Gap thesis behind every Sagentix deliverable
In 2026, "research-backed" and "data-driven" are claims every consultant makes. Most can't back them. AI-saturated content has trained buyers to discount unsourced statistics — what I call the Evidence Gap: the distance between "I think" and "the research shows."
The sample below is my attempt to close that gap structurally. Every quantitative claim carries an APA 7th in-text citation. Every figure is traceable to a source. The 16-point quality gate that ships every deliverable runs on this very sample before it lands in your inbox.
I built Sagentix because the B2B technology founders I work with — $2M–$50M ARR growth-stage companies and pre-revenue ideation founders — face a brutal false binary: pay $250K+ for a top-tier strategy firm engagement (12–16 weeks, Fortune 500 budgets), or DIY with AI tools (300+ founder hours, unverifiable data, no cross-phase integration).
Phase 1 is the risk reversal. CA$4K–$5K, 100% money-back guarantee. If the deliverable doesn't reveal something you didn't already know, you don't pay. This sample is what the format looks like before the content is yours.
The 16-point quality gate
What runs on every deliverable, every time
Source-integrity verification on every claim
APA 7th in-text citation count and density
Regulatory terminology check (Competition Act §52/74.01)
Cross-phase consistency audit
Anti-hallucination gate against knowledge-validation searches
Unfilled placeholder + proof-marker scan
Structural completeness against deliverable skeleton
Subscription-data utilization check
Document architecture conformance (G1–G16)
+ 7 additional structural and evidence checks
How to read the sample. Open the PDF and scan for two things: APA-style in-text citations attached to every quantitative claim, and the per-phase evidence ledger that traces each load-bearing claim to its source. If you've read consulting deliverables before, the difference is immediate.
CMC · CISSP · P.Eng. · MBA
Verifiable founder credentials. CMC-Canada protected designation.
727+ IP artifacts
Frameworks, prompts, evidence tables, and 47 Vertical IQ industry profiles.
100% money-back
Phase 1 PoC at CA$4K–$5K. If it doesn't reveal something new, you don't pay.
Read the sample. Then book a 30-minute scoping call.
The fastest way to test whether evidence-backed GTM beats opinion-based GTM is to do one Phase 1.
Working URL for sharing: sagentix.ca/sample